Battling Racism
How
'Indian' mascots oppress
Written by John Two-Hawks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does it really need to be explained why the "N" word is not
used as the name for a sports team? Probably not. And does
it need to be explained why using racist caricatures of other
minority groups as a team 'mascot' would be unthinkable?
Again, probably not. These things are now common sense
for most sensible people. Yet, for reasons deeply ingrained
in American culture, First Nations people are expected to
explain why certain words and images are blatantly racist!
And as if that weren't enough of an insult, often the reaction
from people who have had these issues brought to their
attention is to either do nothing to change it, or worse,
to actually argue in defense of racism!! Unbelievable!
And so.... Here I go again, with the "explanation"....
Let's take a look at sports team names in
general. There are
only three categories that
nearly all sports team names fall
into.
1. Animals 2. Objects
3. 'Professions'
Some examples:
ANIMALS
Eagles, Bears,
Falcons, Lions, Tigers, Ravens, Bulls,
Wolverines,
Cardinals,
Dolphins, Ducks, Jaguars etc.
OBJECTS
Pistons, Bullets,
Rockets, Suns, Jets, Red Sox, White
Sox, Stars,
Rockies
etc.
PROFESSIONS
Packers, Kings,
Steelers, Spartans, Buccaneers,
Vikings, 49ers,
Cowboys, Rangers, Lakers etc.
Obviously there are
exceptions.
Such as:
Bills (named after Buffalo
Bill), Redwings (could be an object
or an animal), Titans (a
large giant), Rockies (a mountain) etc.
But most sports team names fit into the 3
categories.
Now, a list
of 'Indian' team names/mascots....
Chiefs, Braves,
Indians, Redsk**s, Fighting Illini, Chippewas,
Savages,
Seminoles,
Warriors, Redmen, Chieftains etc.
So
which category do these fit
into?
When
you think of a 'warrior', what's the first image that pops
into
your mind? How about a 'chief' or a 'chieftain'? These
3
terms are nearly always
applied to American Indian people.
Take
some time to investigate the antics and images of teams
that
use these names/mascots. I have yet to find one team
using
one of these names that isn't up to their ears in the use
of
highly offensive racially geared antics and images. It is
due
to this strong racially offensive connection that I tie
these
3 team names/mascots to the 'RACIAL' category.
American Indians are a race of people,
not
ANIMALS, OBJECTS, or 'PROFESSIONS'.
So how does this equate to racial oppression?
Allow me to explain....
These 'Indian'
mascots/team
names oppress Indian
people. They
oppress because they continue in the
use of extreme
negative
stereotypical antics, words
and images.
Antics like the 'tomahawk-chop', mock
'Indian war-chants',
non-Indians painting their faces
and dressing-up like
'Indians', mascots performing
mock 'Indian' dances
or throwing fiery spears etc..
Indian
children cannot possibly look at a stadium full of
thousands
of people mocking their ethnicity and making
fun
of their traditions and feel good about being Indian. This
is
what 'Indian mascots' do. They glorify all the stupid old
stereotypes
and steal the pride Indian children could have in
the
beauty of their race. They insult the entire Indian race.
Insulting
an entire race.... the very real definition of racism....
RACIAL should not be a sports team
name/mascot
category. Did you know that Irish people, not
so
long ago, fought Notre Dame about the harmful
use of the name 'Fighting Irish'? So
you see, this
issue is not exclusively an Indian issue. Many
thousands of institutions, grade-school, collegiate
and professional, have made the decision to do
the right thing and remove their RACIAL names
in exchange for names that fall into the three
categories above. It is the morally right
choice.
"I believe that the hidden agenda behind Indian
mascots
and logos is about cultural, spiritual, and intellectual
exploitation. It's an issue of power and
control.
These
negative ethnic images are driven by those that want
to define other ethnic groups and control their
images. To me, power and control is the ability
to
make you believe that someone's truth is the absolute
truth. Furthermore, it's the ability to define
a reality
and to get other people to affirm that reality as if
it
were their own. As long as such negative mascots
and logos remain within the arena of school
activities, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous
children are learning to tolerate racism in schools."
Excerpt from an article by Dr. Cornel Pewewardy
Comanche/Kiowa
It is my hope
that
these honest words have touched
your heart and made
common sense to you. Racism
is racism, no matter
how 'attractive' one makes it
look. Pilamaye
(Thank you) for taking the time to
read this
material.
Stop in again, as maybe some
day you will come here, and this page will be gone!

For offline orders, calculate your order total
using the online order form,
then go to the Printable
OFFLINE ORDERFORM
OR e-mail
offlineorders@nativecircle.com
Written by - John Two-Hawks